|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 10, 2018 22:16:34 GMT -5
The trolls might wanna reconsider their target. Stormy is used to handling a bunch of dicks coming at her.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2018 22:26:06 GMT -5
And she handles them extremely well!
I was thinking about this tonight -- I wonder why Stormy signed that NDA in the first place. She could easily have gotten more than $130K for her story, I think, given Trump's candidacy.
As I peruse her twitter feed, I have to give her some points for a certain amount of shrewdness. Here's one thought:
Reading the NDA, it seems Stormy felt she was being harassed by Trump's goons when she signed it. She had a lawyer, and if he didn't suck, he probably laughed at that NDA -- it's a crappy piece of lawyering work all round. I'm wondering if she always had the thought in the back of her head that she might repudiate it.
I wonder if it would have made any difference to the outcome of the election if she'd given her story then. I doubt it -- it's clear Trump supporters are more than glad to give him endless mulligans. It might actually be more effective now -- the cover-up, as they say, is worse than the crime.
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 10, 2018 23:45:10 GMT -5
And she handles them extremely well! I was thinking about this tonight -- I wonder why Stormy signed that NDA in the first place. She could easily have gotten more than $130K for her story, I think, given Trump's candidacy. As I peruse her twitter feed, I have to give her some points for a certain amount of shrewdness. Here's one thought: Reading the NDA, it seems Stormy felt she was being harassed by Trump's goons when she signed it. She had a lawyer, and if he didn't suck, he probably laughed at that NDA -- it's a crappy piece of lawyering work all round. I'm wondering if she always had the thought in the back of her head that she might repudiate it. I wonder if it would have made any difference to the outcome of the election if she'd given her story then. I doubt it -- it's clear Trump supporters are more than glad to give him endless mulligans. It might actually be more effective now -- the cover-up, as they say, is worse than the crime. Trump supporters wouldn't have cared if Daniels were butt-nekkid giving their boy a lap dance in the middle of Times Square the day before the election. Come hell or waters high they were focused on only thing: " Trump That Bitch" and anybody with wind in their jaws about me calling a porn skank a porn skank in 2018 who didn't have jack or shit to say about the tons of misogyny dumped on Hillary Clinton by Trump and his mouth-breathing morons in 2016 can just get the funk outta my face. As to why Stormy Daniels signed the NDA, you slide over a stack of dead presidents to a hungry young blonde and tell her, she can have that now or she can roll the dice and spend a lot more than $130,000 in legal bills trying to squeeze more out of Donald Trump later, and how hard does she really have to think about it? Her lawyer probably said, " It's your word against his and who's gonna believe you?" Then there's the other reason. Trump likes NDA. That way he can have his cake, eat it too, deny he did and anyone that can say different has been paid off not to. For Vince and robeiae who say they "can't understand" why Daniels would want to sue Trump and break the NDA, here's something they might want to consider: maybe because when it's the so-called Most Powerful Man in the World we're discussing, it's worth knowing what Trump so desperately does not want anyone to know. It's purely speculative to suggest a porn star blabbing a few weeks before the November election would have swung the pendulum from Trump to Clinton, but we'll never know, will we? Stormy Daniels could have changed the course of history. Or could she? Would it have made a difference to the non-diehard Trump voter who decided late to give him their support? Maybe not, but as much as Americans love adultery that's how much they hate adulterers. Particularly when they get caught. What indeed? Shady business dealings? Payoffs? An unspoken love child somewhere? An all-expenses paid trip for Donald's side piece to one of the better abortion clinics in France? Maintaining discreet silence by some underage teenager who got caught up in a mile-high sex party? Making sure that sex tape with a couple of Thailand ladyboys at the Trump Hotel in Manila never shows up on PornTube? Just how far deep a rabbit hole does Trump's hush money dig? I'd love to know. Wouldn't you?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 9:46:38 GMT -5
I think we're going to go pretty deep into the rabbit hole before this is through. Of course, approximately 30% of us will just ignore it, deny it, or try to justify it.
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 11, 2018 14:20:53 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2018 15:17:36 GMT -5
Yeah, good luck with that, Trump team. I think we'll be seeing a lot of Stormy over the next couple of months.
Frankly, I think Trump would be better off just letting her do what she's going to do. His core supporters will just double down. His efforts to hide his sordid affair actually look worse than the affair itself.
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Mar 17, 2018 15:14:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 21, 2018 7:46:44 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2018 8:06:00 GMT -5
Stormy Daniel's lawyer is making idiots out of Trump and Cohen, and it is fun to watch. I shall definitely tune into 60 minutes on March 25 to watch Stormy and Avenatti. It is literally on my calendar.
Have I mentioned recently that Michael Cohen might be the worst lawyer ever?
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 21, 2018 10:34:59 GMT -5
Stormy Daniel's lawyer is making idiots out of Trump and Cohen, and it is fun to watch. I shall definitely tune into 60 minutes on March 25 to watch Stormy and Avenatti. It is literally on my calendar. Have I mentioned recently that Michael Cohen might be the worst lawyer ever? Jonathan Turley concurs with your conclusion.
The lengths Michael Cohen has gone to in defense of Trump are extreme, but as The Donald values nothing higher than loyalty, Cohen certainly has done his damnedest to please the boss. Whether or not it is worth losing his license or worse, remains to be seen.
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Mar 21, 2018 11:45:08 GMT -5
I think y'all are completely over reacting.
It's perfectly normal behavior for the leader of the free world to sue a porn star for violating a non disclosure agreement that you refuse to admit existed for sex you insist you never had while insisting she should abide by the non disclosure agreement.
Happens all the time.
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Mar 21, 2018 13:19:45 GMT -5
I think y'all are completely over reacting. It's perfectly normal behavior for the leader of the free world to sue a porn star for violating a non disclosure agreement that you refuse to admit existed for sex you insist you never had while insisting she should abide by the non disclosure agreement. Happens all the time. Pictures or it didn't happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2018 14:52:55 GMT -5
I will be astonished if Cohen isn't disbarred, at the very least, by the time this is all done.
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Mar 21, 2018 20:05:14 GMT -5
I think y'all are completely over reacting. It's perfectly normal behavior for the leader of the free world to sue a porn star for violating a non disclosure agreement that you refuse to admit existed for sex you insist you never had while insisting she should abide by the non disclosure agreement. Happens all the time. Pictures or it didn't happen. Am I allowed to link to PornHub?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2018 20:24:55 GMT -5
Pictures or it didn't happen. Am I allowed to link to PornHub? MOD NOTE: Gaah! Noooo! We will have no nude Trump pictures here!
|
|