Post by robeiae on Apr 26, 2017 8:26:47 GMT -5
COO of Facebook Sheryl Sandberg has a new book out: Option B: Facing Adversity, Building Resilience, and Finding Joy.
It's a product of the aftermath of her late husband's death in 2015 at the age of 47, how she dealt with this, how her children dealt with it, how they managed to move on.
Here's CNN on it: www.cnn.com/2017/04/25/politics/sheryl-sandberg-husband-death-jake-tapper-interview-cnntv/index.html
Here's a review at Wired: www.wired.com/2017/04/option-b-sheryl-sandberg-takes-hacker-way-grief/
Here's a longer review at Forbes: www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2017/04/25/sheryl-sandberg-on-option-b-at-work-after-a-loss/#5fbf0e792cfa
From Wired:
From Forbes:
I haven't read the book and probably never will, but I've certainly suffered losses in my life, as have we all. Recently, my aunt's husband died suddenly from a heart attack. Like Sandberg, she is now a widow. But unlike Sandberg, she's not a billionaire. Not even close. She copes with help from friends, family and so forth. I don't know that a series of trite expressions and personal anecdotes from a billionaire represent a way forward for her at all.
The book is a #1 bestseller on Amazon already. Most of the reviews are, at worst, mildly critical. Many point to the issue of privilege here, but note that she acknowledges this to some degree in the book, itself (which I guess is a point for her).
Still, I can't help but see some serious chutzpah here. Her loss was real, her kids' loss was real. I'm sure it hit them all hard. Yet, they had and still have resources that few in the world have or will ever have. It's tough to get how her experiences might translate to others, imo.
But her book is just a jumping off point, as she is far from the only person to engage in this kind of activity. Thus the broader question: when it comes to "life lessons" and the like, how relevant are socio-economic factors in this regard?
It's a product of the aftermath of her late husband's death in 2015 at the age of 47, how she dealt with this, how her children dealt with it, how they managed to move on.
Here's CNN on it: www.cnn.com/2017/04/25/politics/sheryl-sandberg-husband-death-jake-tapper-interview-cnntv/index.html
Here's a review at Wired: www.wired.com/2017/04/option-b-sheryl-sandberg-takes-hacker-way-grief/
Here's a longer review at Forbes: www.forbes.com/sites/nextavenue/2017/04/25/sheryl-sandberg-on-option-b-at-work-after-a-loss/#5fbf0e792cfa
From Wired:
Sandberg does acknowledge the roles of discrimination, poverty, sexism, and racism as contributing to adversity. But they function in the book’s anecdotes more as plot points than systemic realities people must fight every day. This disconnect sometimes results in jarring contrast with the resources Sandberg has at her disposal in her own process of overcoming, such as when she and her kids watch a SpaceX launch as Elon Musk’s guests.
My shorthand review: She has some wise recommendations — including ones for anyone who works, not just those recovering from a loss. I’ll get to these shortly. But some of her advice (and Grant’s, though the book is written in her voice), while heartfelt, is filled with the clichés we’ve heard for years from self-help gurus. “Counting blessings can actually increase happiness and health by reminding us of the good things in life,” she writes. One of the things I liked least in the book: when Sandberg equates loss of life with the loss of a job and advocates using similar tools to combat both.
The book is a #1 bestseller on Amazon already. Most of the reviews are, at worst, mildly critical. Many point to the issue of privilege here, but note that she acknowledges this to some degree in the book, itself (which I guess is a point for her).
Still, I can't help but see some serious chutzpah here. Her loss was real, her kids' loss was real. I'm sure it hit them all hard. Yet, they had and still have resources that few in the world have or will ever have. It's tough to get how her experiences might translate to others, imo.
But her book is just a jumping off point, as she is far from the only person to engage in this kind of activity. Thus the broader question: when it comes to "life lessons" and the like, how relevant are socio-economic factors in this regard?