|
Post by poetinahat on Dec 6, 2017 23:27:31 GMT -5
No. Because even if someone else wrote it, he did so with Trump's OK.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2017 23:40:58 GMT -5
No. Because even if someone else wrote it, he did so with Trump's OK. Though that would still leave him in hot water with this tweet -- if Trump ok'd this, he either ok'd a pointless, incriminating-sounding lie or, if it's true, he obstructed justice. Hey! Now suddenly I can see the snow Robo was talking about!
|
|
|
Post by poetinahat on Dec 7, 2017 0:24:09 GMT -5
To clarify, my "no" unpacks to "No, his supporters won't care".
Hey, you're right - snowflakes all over the page!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2017 8:50:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by michaelw on Dec 7, 2017 8:56:20 GMT -5
Clearly the author of that piece is nothing more than a pleading-heart liberal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2017 9:18:02 GMT -5
I'm afraid I'm going to have to ban you for that, Michael.
|
|
|
Post by michaelw on Dec 7, 2017 9:18:44 GMT -5
My lawyer wrote that post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2017 9:33:02 GMT -5
Pfft. No lawyer wrote that post. Any lawyer would have followed the introductory word "clearly" with a comma.
|
|