|
Post by Optimus on Oct 30, 2022 12:48:24 GMT -5
She seems to be equal part grifter and lunatic.
Here she is claiming that actual Satanists have taken over Scottsdale, AZ:
Granted, people from the actual Church of Satan would proabably run the town much better and more fair than any Christian politicians.
Here she is letting a bunch of uber-religious nutbags "lay hands" on her and annoint her with some sort of mandate from God, or something:
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 27, 2022 19:56:38 GMT -5
It's pretty weird. My first thoughts were either blepharoptosis (droopy eyelid) caused by botox or an issue with all the glue on those big ass fake eyelashes.
Could be either (or neither) but the way she slightly tugged at the skin at the side of her eye made me suspect eyelash glue and that she was trying to unstick the top lid from being glued to the bottom.
But that fact that her right eye lid closes so slowly was weird enough to make me suspect droopy eyelid and since botox is popular with the Hollywood crowd (especially women approaching 40 and older, like Perry), and droopy eyelid can be a (rare) side effect of botox injections to relieve crow's feet, I figure there's a substantially non-zero chance that it could also be that.
Or it's something completely different. Either way, kinda unsettling to watch.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 27, 2022 15:10:05 GMT -5
*Puts "That Guy" hat on*
It's "bias against." If they had a "bias toward conservative Latinas," it would mean that they favor them.
*Takes hat off*
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 27, 2022 15:07:42 GMT -5
Its a Young Frankenstein reference: Ohhhh! Okay, I didn't even make the connection. Haven't seen that movie in decades.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 26, 2022 22:12:27 GMT -5
In reference to the debate last night between Oz and Fetter: There's dark humor, then there's dark humor that's a little too on the nose... Maybe I'm too young to get that joke because...well...I don't.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 23, 2022 20:47:32 GMT -5
It also just got temporarily blocked by a federal court, so...
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 22, 2022 21:55:59 GMT -5
This is one of those times where I honestly can't stand the people on both sides.
The protestors are reality-denying, ignorant lunatics.
However, Heather Heying is also a reality denying, ignorant lunatic (as is her moron husband Bret).
So...yeah. A pox on all their houses.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 22, 2022 21:52:09 GMT -5
This is all pretty much the type of behavior I've come to expect from a grown man who voluntarily goes by the name "Bubba."
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 19, 2022 10:09:23 GMT -5
Ha, what a monumentally stupid answer. Imagine using that answer for any other major issue:
Reporter: "The current govenor says that homeless people are trapped in a failed system. He says it's 'time to house these citizens.' Does he have a point?"
Katie Hobbs: "There are always going to be people living in the streets."
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 18, 2022 17:34:28 GMT -5
It's like watching a train wreck that happens nearly every day but nobody will do anything to stop it.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 13, 2022 20:48:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 13, 2022 14:07:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Oct 5, 2022 20:46:25 GMT -5
WTF, he's truly lost it.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Sept 30, 2022 13:40:28 GMT -5
Lol, yeah that's some top drawer hair-splitting going on in the LA Times piece. I could make the same sort of argument about the American South: "Well sure it practiced slavery, but it was so much more than that, so it's unfair to criticize slavery as if it were fundamental to the South or defining. It gets a raw deal in the history books because the North won." I'd like to see if the slaver-apologists would be okay with that argument. The argument made in the LA Times piece by the Woman King executives takes it even further in absurdity because if they did the same with American South, they'd be citing the work of a "Southern historian who directly descended from the last Confederate soldier."
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Sept 30, 2022 11:38:16 GMT -5
Progressive seem to be in denial of historical reality when it comes to the slave trade and the fact that African tribal leaders were major drivers of it. The English, Italian, Spanish, Turkish, etc. and other African countries didn't just sail to Africa and kidnap slaves. They bought them from African slavers. Just look at the recent kerfuffle over the movie "Woman King," which depicts a group of warriors from a tribe that: 1) got its ass completely kicked in a battle that killed most of them, and; 2) were huge brokers in the slave trade. Funny also that Viola Davis was likely completely ignorant of this or decided to be in complete denial so she could finally pretend that she's an A-list movie actress (she's still not), and has claimed that if people don't go see it they're racist. Also funny in a pathetically predictable kind of way that the movie's director, producers, etc. are trying to claim that the history books are totes wrong about the history of this tribe and that they're the only ones who know the "real" history because they found some random dude that nobody's ever heard of who told them the tribe were actually the heroes and he knows because he claims to have descended from that tribe. And, of course, the LA Times is shilling that bullshit "totally not revisionist revisionist-history" story for them too. I know that movie example might seem random but it and the Don Lemon clip just kind of reinforce a prevailing delusion among some far-leftists who put narrative over statistical, scientific, and historical facts.
|
|