Post by robeiae on Feb 22, 2018 6:41:03 GMT -5
When sugary cereals and despicable lawyers meet:
The opinion (for Cass).
A woman who bought Cap’N'Crunch Crunchberries cereal sued because she was disappointed when she found out that the supposed “crunchberries” were not actual fruit.
The plaintiff, Janine Sugawara, says shes bought the Cap’N'Crunch with crunchberries because she thought crunchberries were real fruit. She subsequently learned that the “berries” were actually nothing more than brightly colored cereal balls, and that the cereal contained no real fruit.
[snip]
There was not only a similar suit filed over the cereal Fruit Loops but in fact, the lawyers who sued over the Fruit Loops cereal were the same lawyers who filed the suit for the Cap’N'Crunch.
The plaintiff, Janine Sugawara, says shes bought the Cap’N'Crunch with crunchberries because she thought crunchberries were real fruit. She subsequently learned that the “berries” were actually nothing more than brightly colored cereal balls, and that the cereal contained no real fruit.
[snip]
There was not only a similar suit filed over the cereal Fruit Loops but in fact, the lawyers who sued over the Fruit Loops cereal were the same lawyers who filed the suit for the Cap’N'Crunch.
The opinion (for Cass).
and also, rofl.
