|
Post by robeiae on Apr 10, 2018 7:56:10 GMT -5
Here's a piece at the Atlantic, re Zuckerberg, technology, and attitudes towards the same. Not a bad piece, interesting in fact. But I was struck by this one line: It's not a bad line, imo. In fact, I think it's quite good. And yet... "Everyone" won't be watching, really. And hardly everyone has retirement savings stashed at all, let alone in a specific stock like FB. It's not that I object to the elitism, it's that I find the assumed extent of such elitism...troubling. It reminds of the "safaris" into middle America, in search of Trump voters. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Amadan on Apr 10, 2018 8:08:41 GMT -5
You are reading too much into it. When a columnist writes "Everyone" in this context, they know that they are not really talking about literally "everyone," only a large portion of their target audience (in this case, Atlantic readers, most of whom probably do have retirement savings and sip chilled beverages).
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Apr 10, 2018 8:14:27 GMT -5
Perhaps I'm getting cynical about my cynicism in my old age? It was weird that the line jumped out at me; I don't normally see things that way, really. So I just wondered if it was actually the line itself, if others would have the same reaction. Thanks.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2018 8:34:34 GMT -5
The line would certainly read differently to me were it in, say, USA today or the NY Post, for the reasons Amadan suggests: Atlantic readers, as a group, probably mostly have stock portfolios, but a goodly portion of USA Today and NY Post readers, like most Americans, likely do not.
Similarly, I imagine Vogue and GQ address their audiences differently.
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Apr 10, 2018 8:37:11 GMT -5
*sips chilled beverage*
Fair points.
|
|