|
|
Post by robeiae on Dec 13, 2020 16:32:48 GMT -5
Oooookayyyyyy....
Gotta say, I tend to think the Cuomo boys are both elitist, entitled assholes, very Kennedy-esque, so I'd accept her story out of hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Dec 13, 2020 18:05:14 GMT -5
Can't stand Cuomo (or his dipshit, meat head brother) but I'll have to wait for actual evidence before I draw any conclusions.
The fact that she's currently trying to make a name for herself in politics AND that Cuomo's name is near the top of the list for Biden's AG makes the accusations seem awfully politically convenient.
Not saying the accuastions aren't true. I have no idea and it'll be unclear until some evidence surfaces. I'm just saying that the timing is a little sus.
|
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Dec 13, 2020 18:56:12 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm totally biased here. I know I am.
|
|
|
|
Post by michaelw on Dec 13, 2020 19:16:42 GMT -5
Cuomo's name is near the top of the list for Biden's AG OMG. I hadn't heard that before, but maybe I shouldn't be surprised. I also learned (maybe a little late?) Cuomo has a book subtitled "Leadership Lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic." Not joking--that's the actual subtitle. You can't make this stuff up. |
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Dec 13, 2020 19:48:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Dec 14, 2020 14:02:22 GMT -5
This seems...convenient:
So, in one of her first posts about this, she claims that she wants to be a "voice for the voiceless." Note how she mentions how she wants to be put into "positions of power:"
Then she posted all of her vague claims against Cuomo. She said that "many saw it" and that they "watched."
Yet, she now says that she doesn't want to talk to any journalists about this because she doesn't want to have to retell/relive her story.
Even though she pretty much just did by her tweet-thread about it.
So, she's made vague but damning claims against a major public figure. Claims that there are "many" witnesses, though as of today, none have come forward or been identified. She refuses to name names so that people might verify her claims that there were "many" witnesses to this alleged repugnant behavior. She refuses to give any details whatsoever to anyone (e.g., journalists) who would be able to verify her story.
All we know is that she's trying to achieve political power positions and that the day before her accusations, Cuomo was rumored to be on the AG short list.
Again, not saying that her claims are false, but her claims and behavior are quite conveniently timed and fishy.
Produce some evidence, allow journalists and others to investigate, or GTFO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Dec 15, 2020 17:35:49 GMT -5
Like President Elect Biden, NY Governor Andrew Cuomo has now been accused of sexual harassment. Unlike Biden, details are very light. Boylan did not provide details of Cuomo's alleged harassment and didn’t respond to messages from The Associated Press. Boylan tweeted Sunday, “To be clear: I have no interest in talking to journalists. I am about validating the experience of countless women and making sure abuse stops.” The NY Post opines that there seems to be a double standard. Of course, the media is silent because they like Cuomo. But besides the double standards for D's vs. R's, vs, the common man, the other thing that worries me is the fact that someone is making an accusation publicly, without any details and doesn't want to be questioned. Here's a story from a college in Canada. Here, a female student accused a male student anonymously. She didn't want him to know who she was, or what he was accused of. The school allowed 4 other students to conduct a hearing without him knowing what he was accused of. He was 'convicted' and banned from certain events and lost his position in the student government he'd just been elected to. The school newspaper ran a story on it, without asking for his side, inferring he was a sexual predator. No details given. The accuser also sent in a column which was printed, naming the student, insisting she shouldn't have to give details, her name or be questioned in anyway. But she had no problem naming him. He appealed and the school hired a lawyer to look into the matter. Now the student was told the details. They talked to witnesses, most of who came from the female student. They set aside the finding, saying consent was given throughout the entire event. Of course, that doesn't repair his reputation. He's suing for 1.5 million. So is this the new thing? You can accuse someone publicly, without any details, insist nobody has the right to question you, know the details, and you have a right to be believed. And if you aren't a powerful Democrat, you're hung out to dry. |
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Dec 15, 2020 17:46:40 GMT -5
There's a discussion on this in another thread, but I think it's deserves its own thread here because you're highlighting some important points. thecollinegate.boards.net/post/32505/threadrobeiae is there a way to teleport those posts over here and merge with this thread? |
|
|
|
Post by CG Admin on Dec 16, 2020 7:21:12 GMT -5
Done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Dec 16, 2020 10:03:49 GMT -5
You, sir, are magic. You have magic powers! YOU'RE A WITCH! BURN THE WITCH!!! |
|
