|
Post by robeiae on Apr 23, 2021 13:20:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Apr 23, 2021 21:20:16 GMT -5
If I were president, I'd make an executive order that the legal answer to any mathematical question should be 8. It's the perfect number.
The exception would be a statistics question. Then, naturally, it would be 8%.
I stand by this.
|
|
|
Post by prozyan on Apr 23, 2021 21:32:45 GMT -5
When I read the headline of the article, I too was thinking we are leading the race toward mediocrity. But there was snippets in the article that made me pause and consider this might not be a bad idea. Such as:
and:
and:
My daughter is an absolute rock star student. She's finishing her sophomore year in high school this year, is taking senior level courses in science and mathematics and, with summer courses, will complete an associates degree from the local NMSU branch. I agree with the above statement that advanced courses are often focused on "covering content" rather than depth of understanding and if these changes are an attempt to remedy that I'm all for it.
That being said, the term "equality" is coming up far too often for me to be comfortable. It strikes me as a veiled attempt to even out the academic accomplishments across social and cultural lines by way of lowering the performance of the over-performing rather than improving the performance of the under-performing.
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Apr 24, 2021 13:13:09 GMT -5
Don't know much about the detail, but if this part is accurate...
Then that's a good move, imo. Having a deep understanding of geometry and advanced algebra will not help 99% of people throughout life, no matter their career fields. However, having a deeper understanding of data analysis, probability, and spatial reasoning would, I feel, greatly increase people's everyday understanding of the world around them and increase the collective amount of critical thinking going on, at least in the US. Mathematical modeling is also a good skill to have that's currently not taught at the high school level in most schools, so I think teaching that's a good idea too.
I took a course in undergrad called, "Calculus for business, management, and social sciences." In my career, I have been a corporate manager, run several businesses, and now do social science research. I have never used calculus at all. That course was both a total waste of my time and a waste of my brain power. It wasn't until I switched majors that I took a stats course, which was immensely more useful (both in my current career and in life) than any math class I've taken since 10th grade.
In terms of algebra and geometry, I've never used anything more advanced than very basic-level operations in any of my careers. Taking algebra II in high school was a complete waste of my time. I hardly remember anything from geometry because I haven't used it since 8th or 9th grade.
I do recognize the need to expose kids to more advanced maths but that can be done more effectively in a more interleaved/interwoven approach that doesn't require the kids to waste an entire year taking one class on a subject they'll hardly use for the rest of their lives, just to expose them to the more advanced concepts that are only covered in one or two chapters from those courses anyway. The kids who choose to pursue careers that require advanced knowledge in those areas would wind up taking them over again in university anyway (unless they can test out of them).
So, just based on my limited understanding of what they're doing in Virginia, I think this might actually be a step in the right direction.
|
|