|
Post by robeiae on May 8, 2021 7:17:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on May 8, 2021 15:38:17 GMT -5
Ha, just read through the study and I'm not sure how it made it past review. The analyses seem really odd in that they claimed that they did one type of analysis (linear regression) but then they reported results for a different kind of analysis (zero-order correlations).
That makes no sense. They also offer no credible hypothesis for why the size of pee pees and honkers would be related and why this should matter. They also didn't make their data publicly available. Too many things about this study smell fishy (no nose-pun intended) to take it seriously.
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on May 8, 2021 15:47:17 GMT -5
*breathes a massive sigh of relief*
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on May 8, 2021 19:11:59 GMT -5
*breathes a massive sigh of relief* Through a big nose?
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on May 8, 2021 20:02:25 GMT -5
No, but I was about to schedule the surgery to make it so...
|
|