Post by robeiae on Apr 21, 2017 7:58:53 GMT -5
Matt Taibbi's review: www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taibbi-on-the-new-book-that-brutalizes-the-clinton-campaign-w477978
Here's a review at the NYT, which concludes thusly:
But I have to note that the NYT writer feels compelled to note this, as well:
Have I ever mentioned how much I DESPISE the "perfect storm" metaphor? I despise it more than Cass despises Angie.
Anyway, I ordered the book, because I would like to see what the perceptions were of the campaign from within the campaign. And I do like Taibbi's general conclusions; interested to see if I draw the same ones.
Anyone read it, yet?
Here it is on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Shattered-Inside-Hillary-Clintons-Campaign/dp/0553447084/
What Allen and Parnes captured in Shattered was a far more revealing portrait of the Democratic Party intelligentsia than, say, the WikiLeaks dumps. And while the book is profoundly unflattering to Hillary Clinton, the problem it describes really has nothing to do with Secretary Clinton.
The real protagonist of this book is a Washington political establishment that has lost the ability to explain itself or its motives to people outside the Beltway.
In fact, it shines through in the book that the voters' need to understand why this or that person is running for office is viewed in Washington as little more than an annoying problem...
If the ending to this story were anything other than Donald Trump being elected president, Shattered would be an awesome comedy, like a Kafka novel – a lunatic bureaucracy devouring itself. But since the ending is the opposite of funny, it will likely be consumed as a cautionary tale.
The real protagonist of this book is a Washington political establishment that has lost the ability to explain itself or its motives to people outside the Beltway.
In fact, it shines through in the book that the voters' need to understand why this or that person is running for office is viewed in Washington as little more than an annoying problem...
If the ending to this story were anything other than Donald Trump being elected president, Shattered would be an awesome comedy, like a Kafka novel – a lunatic bureaucracy devouring itself. But since the ending is the opposite of funny, it will likely be consumed as a cautionary tale.
Here's a review at the NYT, which concludes thusly:
In chronicling these missteps, “Shattered” creates a picture of a shockingly inept campaign hobbled by hubris and unforced errors, and haunted by a sense of self-pity and doom, summed up in one Clinton aide’s mantra throughout the campaign: “We’re not allowed to have nice things.”
There was a perfect storm of other factors, of course, that contributed to Clinton’s loss, including Russian meddling in the election to help elect Trump; the controversial decision by the F.B.I. director, James Comey, to send a letter to Congress about Clinton’s emails less than two weeks before Election Day; and the global wave of populist discontent with the status quo (signaled earlier in the year by the British “Brexit” vote) that helped fuel the rise of both Trump and Bernie Sanders. In a recent interview, Clinton added that she believed “misogyny played a role” in her loss.
Have I ever mentioned how much I DESPISE the "perfect storm" metaphor? I despise it more than Cass despises Angie.
Anyway, I ordered the book, because I would like to see what the perceptions were of the campaign from within the campaign. And I do like Taibbi's general conclusions; interested to see if I draw the same ones.
Anyone read it, yet?
Here it is on Amazon: www.amazon.com/Shattered-Inside-Hillary-Clintons-Campaign/dp/0553447084/