Innocent until proven guilty is not required. | THE COLLINE GATE

Vince524
Illuminati

Eating bacon

Posts: 2,009

Innocent until proven guilty is not required. Jul 13, 2021 19:54:00 GMT -5

Post by Vince524 on Jul 13, 2021 19:54:00 GMT -5

This according to Cathrine Lhamon who is Biden's nomination to be put in charge of OCR. She has a record, and it's abysmal.

She played a major role during the Obama administration in ruining the educations and often the lives of countless students – almost all of them male – who were found guilty of sexual assault under flagrantly unfair, effectively guilt-presuming rules dictated by her office. Her commands also pressured universities to ignore or discount powerful evidence of innocence.

So this time around, Congress needs to heed the cry.

How this will work, I'm not sure. Schools have to also stay within the precedents set by courts, although they often don't until a lawsuit is brought. I'm told that most require a 40k retainer. Her reality has been rebuked by courts dozens of times. Putting her in charge is like putting Darth Vader in charge of Bring your Daughter to Work Day, or Cruella de Vil in charge of animal protection laws.

Last Edit: Jul 13, 2021 19:55:28 GMT -5 by Vince524

Quote

Optimus
Illuminati

Posts: 2,508

Innocent until proven guilty is not required. Jul 22, 2021 11:14:57 GMT -5

Post by Optimus on Jul 22, 2021 11:14:57 GMT -5

Christ, here statements and attitude are reprehensible. You're right that these statements should be more than disqualifying. I can't tell if she's intentionally lying or if she's just outright stupid, so blinded by her activism that facts just don't register.

This looks like yet another case where Biden is doing someone a favor. Or, what's more likely, one of his handlers told him who to nominate (again, as a cronyistic favor), so he did, likely having little clue who this fool is.

Quote

Vince524
Illuminati

Eating bacon

Posts: 2,009

Innocent until proven guilty is not required. Jul 22, 2021 15:37:51 GMT -5 Optimus likes this

Post by Vince524 on Jul 22, 2021 15:37:51 GMT -5

Jul 22, 2021 11:14:57 GMT -5 Optimus said:

Christ, here statements and attitude are reprehensible. You're right that these statements should be more than disqualifying. I can't tell if she's intentionally lying or if she's just outright stupid, so blinded by her activism that facts just don't register.

This looks like yet another case where Biden is doing someone a favor. Or, what's more likely, one of his handlers told him who to nominate (again, as a cronyistic favor), so he did, likely having little clue who this fool is.

What I think is this.

Biden was sort of handed the nomination by the D's when everyone else dropped out. People made deals. One of the deals was that OCR go back to Lhamon. It was also in exchange for people not going all METOO# on him after the Reade allegation. (Whether you believe her or not, people changed their tune on how an allegation against someone should work.) People who are the ideologues when it comes to this want Lhamon back because she was a guilty until proven innocent with no ability to do so. The idea is to push this concept on campuses and then get laws changed in criminal matters so you have to prove innocence.

Mr. Bragg, in an interview, said he planned to “reboot” the sex crimes bureau “from the ground up,” by assessing its leadership and staff with input from survivors. He said he also intended to evaluate why certain cases are rejected, and that the likelihood of a conviction should not be a determining factor.

...
It would take little effort for Bragg to make good on his promise of prosecuting presumptively innocent people for whom there is no expectation of conviction for no better reason than to appease the “survivor” under the “modern understanding of sexual violence.” Put the accuser into an NA grand jury and boom, he’s indicted. Instruct the grand jury that it’s rape if she feels it’s rape and let the judge be the bad guy when he inspects the grand jury minutes for sufficiency. Judges in Manhattan aren’t necessarily immune from being a bit antagonistic toward indicted rapists either.

I think Lhamon knows what she was saying, and she wanted to say more, but the public isn't enlightened enough to deal with it yet.

Quote

Vince524
Illuminati

Eating bacon

Posts: 2,009

Innocent until proven guilty is not required. Jul 30, 2021 18:18:30 GMT -5

Post by Vince524 on Jul 30, 2021 18:18:30 GMT -5

www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2021/07/30/bidens-attack-on-due-process-violates-core-american-principles/5406426001/

Biden, who has made it clear for years now that he does not believe in the rigorous investigation of charges of sexual assault– unless, of course, those charges are made against him. Speaking in 2016, Biden argued that no woman who accuses a man of sexual assault should be expected to answer detailed questions about her allegations of the sort that any accuser of any other crime would be expected to answer: Questions such as “What did you say?” or “Were you drinking?” “No one,” Biden concluded, “particularly a court of law, has a right to ask any of those questions.”

Worth a read if only for the line, "Will someone, please, send the man an unabridged copy of "To Kill a Mockingbird"?"

Quote