Post by Vince524 on Sept 10, 2020 19:23:33 GMT -5
They responded.
First, here is my email:
To whom it may concern,
I have read with great concern of the interaction concerning Mr. Sandmann and Dr. Tomkins. While I understand that your school is doing a review, I don't believe the 'apology' offered by Dr. Tomkins is satisfactory. To have a member of your faculty publicly comment on a student, one who has been publicly abused by many, suffering from death threats, is unacceptable. While I respect Dr. Tomkin's right to express their opinions, to openly talk about using your schools disciplinary rules where there has been no misconduct, or even contact, is completely unacceptable. Could Mr. Sandmann possible take Dr. Tomkin's class and feel safe and not targeted? If Dr. Tomkin did document what he thought of as misconduct on the part of Mr. Sandmann, would anyone feel confident in that report or that Dr. Tomkin could objectively file a report when clearly he was expecting it and would be over scrutinizing Mr. Sandmann who became famous because an adult activist decided to bang a drum in his face, then lied to the national media (who were far too eager to believe simply because he wore a MAGA hat?). This behavior is shocking, more so since it comes from a diversity scholar.
I understand many will not care for the fact that Mr. Sandmann has now openly embraced such a divisive president as Donald Trump. Perhaps some could reflect on the fact that had some on the left come the Nick's defense, he might not have become such an ardent supporter. I myself often find the President's actions and words beyond comprehension, or defense. I personally did not vote for him, nor will I this term. That being said, if your school's mission is, as Dr. Tomkin's remarks seem to suggest, the antithesis of a minor bullied, threatened, and defamed on the national stage, perhaps it's time to address that. Publicly.
Below is their response.
The biggest issue, imho, for the college is the fact that the school's 'diversity scholar' not only felt it appropriate to engage in a public conversation on Facebook about a student, disparaging him in the process, but brought the schools disciplinarily process into the discussion, again in a case where Sandmann has literally done nothing. (not even smirk.)
I can't help but wonder if Sandmann called his lawyer, worrying at all if he could get in trouble or kicked out. If so, his school should pick up that bill.
First, here is my email:
To whom it may concern,
I have read with great concern of the interaction concerning Mr. Sandmann and Dr. Tomkins. While I understand that your school is doing a review, I don't believe the 'apology' offered by Dr. Tomkins is satisfactory. To have a member of your faculty publicly comment on a student, one who has been publicly abused by many, suffering from death threats, is unacceptable. While I respect Dr. Tomkin's right to express their opinions, to openly talk about using your schools disciplinary rules where there has been no misconduct, or even contact, is completely unacceptable. Could Mr. Sandmann possible take Dr. Tomkin's class and feel safe and not targeted? If Dr. Tomkin did document what he thought of as misconduct on the part of Mr. Sandmann, would anyone feel confident in that report or that Dr. Tomkin could objectively file a report when clearly he was expecting it and would be over scrutinizing Mr. Sandmann who became famous because an adult activist decided to bang a drum in his face, then lied to the national media (who were far too eager to believe simply because he wore a MAGA hat?). This behavior is shocking, more so since it comes from a diversity scholar.
I understand many will not care for the fact that Mr. Sandmann has now openly embraced such a divisive president as Donald Trump. Perhaps some could reflect on the fact that had some on the left come the Nick's defense, he might not have become such an ardent supporter. I myself often find the President's actions and words beyond comprehension, or defense. I personally did not vote for him, nor will I this term. That being said, if your school's mission is, as Dr. Tomkin's remarks seem to suggest, the antithesis of a minor bullied, threatened, and defamed on the national stage, perhaps it's time to address that. Publicly.
Below is their response.
Dear Vincent,
Thank you for reaching out and for taking the time to share your comments.
Transylvania values diverse viewpoints and encourages challenging and respectful discussion on its campus.
In regards to the recent social media posts, the faculty member has apologized. Beyond that, we will not discuss our students without their permission or personnel matters involving faculty or staff.
We appreciate your understanding.
Thank you for reaching out and for taking the time to share your comments.
Transylvania values diverse viewpoints and encourages challenging and respectful discussion on its campus.
In regards to the recent social media posts, the faculty member has apologized. Beyond that, we will not discuss our students without their permission or personnel matters involving faculty or staff.
We appreciate your understanding.
The biggest issue, imho, for the college is the fact that the school's 'diversity scholar' not only felt it appropriate to engage in a public conversation on Facebook about a student, disparaging him in the process, but brought the schools disciplinarily process into the discussion, again in a case where Sandmann has literally done nothing. (not even smirk.)
I can't help but wonder if Sandmann called his lawyer, worrying at all if he could get in trouble or kicked out. If so, his school should pick up that bill.