|
Post by maxinquaye on May 8, 2017 17:57:32 GMT -5
Now that the French presidential election is done and dusted, it is a curious fact that both the French and the US republics were founded on the same ideals that were crosspollinated across the Atlantic several times.
Thomas Jefferson (I think) was very much inspired by the revolution in France when he went there as an ambassador. The French revolution itself was inspired by the US one. Unfortunately, external and internal pressure derailed the French revolution into terror and tyranny for a while.
France had reset its republic five times by now, which is why we say it's the 5th Republic. The last time it was reset to fix the unstable form of parliamentary democracy it had. That was in 1958. The 4th Republic was the reboot after Hitler had been defeated, and France was liberated. The 3rd died when France was occupied, and was replaced by the Vichy regime - which no living Frenchman admits as a legitimate French state, except that it of course was the continuation of the 3rd Republic with all the "red tape" of human rights and equality, brotherhood, and liberty cut out.
This made me think, and wonder if it could be argued that the US too has reset and rebooted its republic. There's the initial one under the Articles of Confederation, which proved unworkable. Then there was the Civil War which changed the whole thing again. This would make the current US the 2nd republic? 3rd? 4th?
And would you like to explicitly change the Republic into the next numeral now, and if so, what about the setup would you change?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2017 20:42:22 GMT -5
This is quite an interesting question, and I shall have to mull it. I'd argue it's the second republic now (since the civil war). But as to what I'd change (enough for it to qualify as a third), I'd have to think. Frankly, right now I'm more afraid it will go in a direction I don't like -- e.g., a theocracy or an authoritarian state.
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on May 9, 2017 8:21:37 GMT -5
By "mull," Cass means "consume adult beverages."
Anyway, I would argue that there was no American Republic under the Articles of Confederation.
And I would adopt the relatively common position that prior to the Civil War, we were "united states in America." After the Civil War, we became "THE United States of America."
I don't think there's really any room for numerical republics in all of this. The US Federal Government is not what it was in 1870, it is true, but change has come as developmental change, not via "reboots" or the like.
|
|
|
Post by maxinquaye on May 9, 2017 9:10:20 GMT -5
These kinds of questions always works best when influenced by various liquid beverages, yes.
|
|
|
Post by Don on May 14, 2017 8:45:49 GMT -5
I'd also argue that the 19-teens and FDR's reign were additional radical reformations. Typing on an iPad so I can't do justice to the argument at the moment, however.
(General FYI: married off stepson (officiated, too) and lost my mom, all in the last week. Hopefully life will settle down soon.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2017 9:39:02 GMT -5
Don, I'm so sorry about your mom.
Congrats on the stepson, though. That is quite an overwhelming week.
|
|
|
Post by Don on May 14, 2017 10:04:03 GMT -5
Thanks, @cassandraw. Although mom was 97 and it was no surprise, the timing was terrible, since I was committed to officiate. She made it plain where I needed to be, however, and would brook no argument. That's the kind of woman she was.
|
|