Post by robeiae on May 27, 2017 16:50:12 GMT -5
circa.com/politics/declassified-memos-show-fbi-illegally-shared-spy-data-on-americans-with-private-parties
Here are the documents in question: www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf
The third party stuff starts around page 83. Reading the whole thing is giving me a headache,
The above article also has links to other declassified stuff on FISA-related activities.
My general take:
1) I feel somewhat vindicated, personally, as I was harping on metadata and minimization procedures years ago, though I know I'm no expert. Still, it seemed apparent to me that the FISA Court was being used as a means to circumvent FISA requirements on a regular basis.
2) There's an awful lot of legal gymnastics going on to justify what everyone involved knows--imo--are activities that go beyond the scope of government authority. The 4th Amendment is being treated as f it were just some sort of warning label, as opposed to an actual limit on government action.
3) But the problem in all if this is that the arguments and legal wrangling is all occurring between government officials behind closed doors. And this is pretty scary, imo.
The FBI has illegally shared raw intelligence about Americans with unauthorized third parties and violated other constitutional privacy protections, according to newly declassified government documents that undercut the bureau’s public assurances about how carefully it handles warrantless spy data to avoid abuses or leaks.
Here are the documents in question: www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf
The third party stuff starts around page 83. Reading the whole thing is giving me a headache,
The above article also has links to other declassified stuff on FISA-related activities.
My general take:
1) I feel somewhat vindicated, personally, as I was harping on metadata and minimization procedures years ago, though I know I'm no expert. Still, it seemed apparent to me that the FISA Court was being used as a means to circumvent FISA requirements on a regular basis.
2) There's an awful lot of legal gymnastics going on to justify what everyone involved knows--imo--are activities that go beyond the scope of government authority. The 4th Amendment is being treated as f it were just some sort of warning label, as opposed to an actual limit on government action.
3) But the problem in all if this is that the arguments and legal wrangling is all occurring between government officials behind closed doors. And this is pretty scary, imo.