|
Post by Christine on Jul 12, 2017 19:27:38 GMT -5
Apparently if you want to hear from the POTUS other than by Twitter or via Fox and Friends, you can tune into.... The Christian Broadcasting Network. Some verbal vomit comments from Trump in the CBN interview: So I guess Putin was totes rooting for Hillary Clinton? Side note: background on Pat Robertson (though I doubt this is news to any of you). And this is who Trump chooses to be interviewed by. Because it's safe, and part of Trump's base. Crazy, extremist as fuck, but... they like him. They really, really like him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 12, 2017 19:45:48 GMT -5
No, it's totally true. Trump had a heart-to-heart with Vlad while they were enjoying a bottle of bubbly in the hot tub together just after the election, and Vlad 'fessed up.
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 12, 2017 20:07:59 GMT -5
I can believe they were in a hot tub more readily than anything else Trump claims happened between them.
Sad.
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Jul 13, 2017 10:43:05 GMT -5
My own two cents: Putin was rooting for no one, just a lot of messiness.
I think the two opposing ideas that Putin--who is not the almighty god of hellfire that many seem to believe him to be--didn't want Clinton or didn't want Trump, because one or the other was going to stand up to him, give him what-fer, are not consistent with reality. Putin's already gotten over plenty on the Obama admin, when Clinton was Secretary of State. He's got no reason to fear her. And Putin recognizes Trump for what he is, I am sure. So he's got no reason to fear Trump.
Which I guess is part of my continued skepticism on all of this Russian stuff. I don't see the net benefit for Putin in having Trump over Clinton. I don't see any strong arguments as to why this would be the case, especially in light of what has gone on across the last eight years or so.
And of the two--Clinton and Trump--I think we all know (as does Putin) that Trump is the one most likely to go overboard in a response to something, to take it personally. Moreover, Trump's approach to energy is bad news for Russia (and OPEC), as Trump fairly notes.
So, granting that Putin totes rooting for Clinton is ridiculous, how is Putin totes rooting for Trump any smarter?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2017 11:00:42 GMT -5
I agree that Putin didn't so much want Trump for president as he wanted to create chaos for the U.S., and promote distrust and discord. That said, Trump as president, with his history of grifting, bombast, and erratic positions and statements, promotes that. And IMO I think there is little question Trump's administration is more favorable to Russia overall than Hillary's would be. It's clear the Russians got involved in this election, and it's clear that everything they did was to the advantage of Trump. But what would promote American chaos even more than merely electing Trump is getting Trump elected, and then blowing him up and compromising him by, e.g., demonstrating that he was perfectly willing to collaborate with hostile powers. Also, I think Trump has a shitload more sleaze to hide than Clinton (hers has been under a microscope for a couple of decades). Hence, more for the Russians to expose and manipulate. I posted a joking Nigerian-scam type letter from the Russian lawyer in the silly forum, and of course, it is a joke. But in all seriousness, I think it's quite possible that the whole meeting was part of a set up. I emphasize "part of". Let's not forget Flynn, Kushner wanting to set up secret back channel communications with Russia, etc. All of this stuff is not normal, and it all goes in one direction. I keep saying tip of the iceberg, but I will say it again -- we ain't seen nothing yet. That said, nighttimer, Amadan, et al. may be quite right in their cynicism that it will actually bring Trump down. I am increasingly struggling to have faith in American institutions and the American people. The few on the conservative side who are standing up to decry this mess as it should be decried (e.g., Max Boot) are being hissed off the stage by the Trump Republican Brain Trust as traitors and idiots. (I just watched Boot's debate with that repulsive preening fucker Tucker Carlson. Christ.)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2017 11:25:13 GMT -5
I agree that Putin didn't so much want Trump for president as he wanted to create chaos for the U.S., and promote distrust and discord. That said, Trump as president, with his history of grifting, bombast, and erratic positions and statements, promotes that. And IMO I think there is little question Trump's administration is more favorable to Russia overall than Hillary's would be. It's clear the Russians got involved in this election, and it's clear that everything they did was to the advantage of Trump. But what would promote American chaos even more than merely electing Trump is getting Trump elected, and then blowing him up and compromising him by, e.g., demonstrating that he was perfectly willing to collaborate with hostile powers. Also, I think Trump has a shitload more sleaze to hide than Clinton (hers has been under a microscope for a couple of decades). Hence, more for the Russians to expose and manipulate. I posted a joking Nigerian-scam type letter from the Russian lawyer in the silly forum, and of course, it is a joke. But in all seriousness, I think it's quite possible that the whole meeting was part of a set up. I emphasize "part of". Let's not forget Flynn, Kushner wanting to set up secret back channel communications with Russia, etc. All of this stuff is not normal, and it all goes in one direction. I keep saying tip of the iceberg, but I will say it again -- we ain't seen nothing yet. That said, nighttimer, Amadan, et al. may be quite right in their cynicism that it will actually bring Trump down. I am increasingly struggling to have faith in American institutions and the American people. The few on the conservative side who are standing up to decry this mess as it should be decried (e.g., Max Boot) are being hissed off the stage by the Trump Republican Brain Trust as traitors and idiots. (I just watched Boot's debate with that repulsive preening fucker Tucker Carlson. Christ.) Moreover -- which candidate was more likely to weaken the U.S.'s alliance with Europe, to make the U.S. turn inward (America first!) to make the rest of the world distrustful of it? Hence strengthening Russia's position as a power?
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Jul 13, 2017 11:37:11 GMT -5
Sure. But at the same time, those America-first polices are damaging to Russia in the energy market. See my OPEC thread. And that's big bucks to Russia, to the oligarchs who support Putin.
And let's remember Uranium One, now owned by a Russian state-owned corp.
So again, there's stuff for both positions, which I think make both largely untenable.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2017 11:46:27 GMT -5
Trump sways with the most powerful wind and to the last person who purrs in his ear. I mean, Putin had Trump considering a joint cyber unit, FFS. I think overall far more pros than cons for Russia in a Trump presidency. The reverse is true for the EU. A weaker EU and weaker EU/American alliance IMO is the ultimate win for Putin.
If Trump turns his back (or hems and haws) as Putin moves in on the Baltic states and encroaches on Ukraine, continues to become more dominant in the middle east...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2017 12:04:12 GMT -5
I must also add -- does it ultimately matter whether the Russians wanted Trump to win and why? Does it exonerate either Russia or Trump's camp?
They meddled in our election -- our intelligence confirms that beyond a doubt.
Everything they did during the campaign was aimed to assist Trump rather than Clinton -- can you name an exception?
Trump's team was delighted to covertly take help from the Russian government. See Don Jr.'s email.
Trump's team lied and lied and lied about its contacts with Russian government agents until forced to do otherwise. See, e.g , the news.
Maybe Putin thought Trump would be better for Russia. Maybe he just wanted to sow chaos. Maybe he was acting on a mistaken premise that Trump would be better.
It's an interesting discussion, but does it actually matter? Does it disprove Russia's interference or erase the Don Jr. emails demonstrating their eagerness to go along with it from existence?
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Jul 13, 2017 18:01:25 GMT -5
My own two cents: Putin was rooting for no one, just a lot of messiness. I think the two opposing ideas that Putin--who is not the almighty god of hellfire that many seem to believe him to be-- didn't want Clinton or didn't want Trump, because one or the other was going to stand up to him, give him what-fer, are not consistent with reality. Putin's already gotten over plenty on the Obama admin, when Clinton was Secretary of State. He's got no reason to fear her. And Putin recognizes Trump for what he is, I am sure. So he's got no reason to fear Trump. Which I guess is part of my continued skepticism on all of this Russian stuff. I don't see the net benefit for Putin in having Trump over Clinton. I don't see any strong arguments as to why this would be the case, especially in light of what has gone on across the last eight years or so. And of the two--Clinton and Trump--I think we all know (as does Putin) that Trump is the one most likely to go overboard in a response to something, to take it personally. Moreover, Trump's approach to energy is bad news for Russia (and OPEC), as Trump fairly notes. So, granting that Putin totes rooting for Clinton is ridiculous, how is Putin totes rooting for Trump any smarter? I disagree. Trump was Putin's best bet and Putin knew it. For things like looking the other way on human rights violations. (All you've got to do, essentially, is put a Trump's face on a hotel and he'll forget to mention you're a complete asshole to your citizens.) For things like that $500 billion oil drill deal. Yeah, I know, Trump has so far denied lifting the sanctions imposed by Obama, but of course he would have to, with all the scrutiny right now. It's only a matter of time, imo. It's a waiting game for Putin, but if he's patient (and he is), pretty soon, Trump will be making his "deals," with former Exxon CEO Tillerson as his advisor. It's all about the money. That quid pro quo so many are rushing to claim doesn't exist in all of this suspected collusion with Russia? I would bet a big part of it was a promise of the eventual lifting of the sanctions, and looking the other way in regard to Crimea, Ukraine, et al.
|
|