|
Post by robeiae on Nov 11, 2017 16:52:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Optimus on Nov 12, 2017 0:50:15 GMT -5
Yeah, whoever did it, it's pretty stupid. I think she looks a lot better with the hair, anyway. I would've thought, given the recent backlash from models/celebrities against using photoshop/airbrushing on their pics (e.g., www.revelist.com/internet/iskra-lawrence-lingerie-photoshop/7882), that the photog (or whomever) should've known better than to do this. It's fake, archaic bullshit that needs to go the way of the dodo.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 12, 2017 15:45:01 GMT -5
She looks good both ways, IMO. She could carry off a bald head or a full-on 'fro and look good. Bone structure, baby.
It's possible they didn't so much mean it as a racist thing so much as that they thought the starker look was more interesting (I don't personally think she looks more European in the hair-less picture, but maybe it's just me). But come on, they totally must have known that the picture was edited. They should at least have gotten her sign-off on editing the pic and foreseen the backlash.
|
|