|
|
Post by robeiae on Dec 14, 2017 17:43:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by celawson on Dec 14, 2017 18:28:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Dec 14, 2017 23:06:35 GMT -5
"God complex" is an apt descriptor.
Also, I submit "psychopath."
|
|
|
|
Post by Don on Dec 15, 2017 5:55:54 GMT -5
If a dude has the skills to give me a new liver, I have no problem whatsoever with him signing his work. Is there a real issue here, like safety, or did this impact the performance of the replacement parts? Was anything really hurt, except feelings? If not, how does it differ from other SJW baloney?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Dec 15, 2017 6:31:53 GMT -5
Signing ones work implies ownership. I had a quad in August and a carotid done last month. If I discovered my surgeons signed something I'd reciprocate.
With prejudice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Dec 15, 2017 7:12:04 GMT -5
So I get this is really not a good thing, but how does one find out that you're liver has been signed?
And is there any danger of someone else coming along and saying, "Hey, that's my liver. See, it's got my initials on it."
|
|
|
|
Post by Rolling Thunder on Dec 15, 2017 9:20:36 GMT -5
So I get this is really not a good thing, but how does one find out that you're liver has been signed? And is there any danger of someone else coming along and saying, "Hey, that's my liver. See, it's got my initials on it." The danger lies in ignoring medical protocol. If a surgeon can vandalize an organ, perhaps slipping a micro chip in for tracking is okay, too. Or maybe drop in a saint Christopher's medal. Same shelf. Different item. The point of the action was to ensure surgeons do only what the patient agreed to. |
|
|
|
Post by robeiae on Dec 15, 2017 9:28:20 GMT -5
If a dude has the skills to give me a new liver, I have no problem whatsoever with him signing his work. Is there a real issue here, like safety, or did this impact the performance of the replacement parts? Was anything really hurt, except feelings? If not, how does it differ from other SJW baloney? Well, maybe I'm wrong on this, but every additional second one is under general anesthesia represents additional risk, every additional second one is under the knife represents additional risk. So I don't think I'd be happy about a surgical procedure being extended for any amount of time just so an egomaniac could sign his "work." |
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Dec 15, 2017 9:54:15 GMT -5
So I get this is really not a good thing, but how does one find out that you're liver has been signed? And is there any danger of someone else coming along and saying, "Hey, that's my liver. See, it's got my initials on it." The danger lies in ignoring medical protocol. If a surgeon can vandalize an organ, perhaps slipping a micro chip in for tracking is okay, too. Or maybe drop in a saint Christopher's medal. Same shelf. Different item. The point of the action was to ensure surgeons do only what the patient agreed to. I don’t argue any of that, what I’m asking is how would one find out? And beyond that, I was being a smart ass. |
|
|
|
Post by celawson on Dec 15, 2017 11:38:09 GMT -5
Vince, apparently the initials were found by another surgeon during a different surgery on the patient. It's possible many more, even hundreds of patients, have this guy's initials.  |
|
|
|
Post by Vince524 on Dec 15, 2017 12:07:49 GMT -5
So can another patient sue him without having someone check to see if his initials are there? It might be hard to prove, but the doctor might settle.
I didn't sign your liver sir.
Why not?
Not my best work.
|
|
