Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2017 21:39:08 GMT -5
Just curious. Do you think you have a better handle on how people overall are feeling in your city on major events occurring there than I do? Or do you think my guess is just as good as yours?
Do you think Max is more likely to have a handle on how people are generally thinking on terrorism or nudism or croissants or whatever in Sweden, or are you likely to be just as hep to that as he is?
I dunno, I was kind of thinking that living here for the last couple of decades in daily contact with other New Yorkers, including having lived through a major terrorist attack on it, and having discussed terrorist incidents about 150 zillion times with various New Yorkers since then and having observed my city and citizens react to such events, and having actually been here and out and about on the day of this particular attack and having chatted about it with others who were also here, and following all the local press on it, and having observed how life generally was plugging along here since it happened and how events and plans weren't being canceled and how local people were demonstrably more irritated about possibly temporary blocks on the bike path than about another attack, maybe did give me some added insight into how people generally were feeling here overall, in terms of whether the locals seemed to be freaking out over this particular event.
You know what? That actually still seems completely reasonable to me, as do my statements about the unique aspects of New York.
Come up with some cites that contradict me, and I'll look at them. Meanwhile, I'm done.
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Nov 3, 2017 21:55:28 GMT -5
There are 8.5 million people in NYC. How many do you know?
I don't claim to have a better handle than you, at all. Just doubting your handle.
But as I said, I think the reason you aren't picking up on any real concern regarding this incident isn't because people are being "stoic" so much as this was a random incident, and those you've spoken are smart enough, even-keeled enough, to see that.
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Nov 3, 2017 22:28:19 GMT -5
Come up with some cites that contradict me, and I'll look at them. Meanwhile, I'm done. Not that this was even my argument to begin with, but here you go, from the New York Times:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 9:06:48 GMT -5
and yet the other article I cited quoted people saying the crowds were large and festive. As do others. See e.g., abcnews.go.com/US/nyc-halloween-parade-marches-terror-attack-lower-manhattan/story?id=50849526mashable.com/2017/11/01/halloween-parade-new-york-attack/#2OikKhCKsgqFI didn't notice a difference, myself Taking that aside and assuming there was a smaller turnout -- the parade started four hours after the attack, a few blocks away from it. You don't find anything cool and, like, resilient, about the fact it went forward and that lots of people turned out? see also, e.g., this -- www.reuters.com/article/us-new-york-attack-marathon/new-york-marathoners-undaunted-by-deadly-truck-attack-idUSKBN1D40ALBut quite frankly, I'm unclear on why either one of you would be dead set on proving that people in my city are cowering in their homes, except to get in my face. Seriously, I don't. Which is boring and pointless. You two can enjoy it without me.
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Nov 4, 2017 9:44:08 GMT -5
I don't think Cass was saying she was speaking for all NYer's but rather herself and her general sense of what other's around her feel. Go back and read her posts. That's not what she is saying at all. My point, as I've said more than once, is pretty much exactly the opposite. Maybe if you actually listened instead of attacking and ranting, posters wouldn't have to repeat themselves. "Attacking and ranting?" Now that's a good one. You'd know something about attacking and ranting at posters, wouldn't you? I defer to your vastly superior experience on how to lose your shit. I'd listen if you had something to say that wasn't delivered dripping in derision and condescension. It's pretty haughty that you are trying to school me on attitudes about terrorism in New York as if the rest of the country spent the day watching cartoons and scratching in inappropriate places waiting for the "New Yorkers" to tell us what it was really like. I'm going to hazard a guess and say you weren't in the World Trade Center that day and you didn't hop on your bike and try to pedal away from a choking cloud of smoke, debris and falling building and you probably didn't rush to the nearest hospital to donate blood for the survivors that didn't come. I'm going to hazard a guess and say you probably got through 9/11 the way most of America did. Glued to a television and recoiling in horror. That was probably a wrong guess, but then again, I wasn't there at the WTC on September 11, 2001 to know for sure. But then, neither were you. When Los Angeles erupted in bloody rioting after the Rodney King/LAPD verdict none of us here were there, but all of us probably had an opinion about it. When New Orleans was devastated by Hurricane Katrina, none of us were there treading through black water and trying to survive, but all of us probably had an opinion about it. When terrorists took control of two planes and sent them careening into the Twin Towers, none of us were in the planes, in the buildings or on the ground, but all of us probably had an opinion about it. But now only your opinion counts about NYC in the wake of 9/11? That's not adorable at all. Yeah. That, and my wife's understandable apprehension means a lot more to me than your condescension. It would be one thing if you had said, "Sorry to hear that, but tell her people are going about their daily lives with open eyes and a calm resolve and the police are stepping up their presence to avoid further acts of terror." But you didn't do that did you? You jumped in with your feelings on your sleeve in response to my comment to Vince with a nasty, " New Yorkers don't have time to cower and freak out." Us vs. Them, huh? Well, I'm so happy for you and your Halloween party and your bike path and what everyone you know is saying, but everyone YOU know ain't anyone I know, so understand if I don't take what you say as the gospel truth and last word on the subject. However, I do appreciate you finally admitting you can't speak for every human living in New York. That falls under the category of "Knew That Already." Your failure to grasp my point does not mean there is no point. I can assure you it is not, "YOU'RE WRONG, CASSANDRA!" If I were saying, "YOU'RE RIGHT, CASSANDRA!" you would have no problem grasping the point. But to agree with you would only mean we'd both be wrong. We (meaning all of us at TCG and everyone in the country) could all potentially be victims of a terrorist attack. Probably none of us will be. The one thing I claim for New Yorkers is not so much outstanding bravery but rather a certain resignation to the inevitably of attacks, both because of 9/11 and because the attractiveness of our city as a target. But hey, on the attitudes of New Yorkers and how they are thinking and feeling, or the effect of having witnessed a major terrorist attack and lived through its effects on your city, hey, I give -- you and nighttimer have your finger on that pulse way more than I do. And clearly, you also have a clearer sense of what it was like here on Halloween night than I do. I can't say I do because I wasn't, but then I never said I did. And Christine and I never claimed to have our finger on the pulse more than you do. That's your claim because you personalized the debate and insisted on sharing your bona fides when nobody called them into question in the first place. If there's an axe to be ground here, you're the one doing it, Cassandra.
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Nov 4, 2017 10:00:05 GMT -5
But quite frankly, I'm unclear on why either one of you would be dead set on proving that people in my city are cowering in their homes, except to get in my face. Seriously, I don't. You don't or you won't? The first person to introduce the word "cowering" in this thread was you on October 31 at 11:47 pm or don't you read your own posts? You want to spin it as Christine or I made this about people cowering in their homes to get in your face? Two words: PROVE IT. Because if you're taking offense on a debate board someone has the audacity to have a different opinion than you I can't help you with that. That's the second thing you've said I am in complete agreement with. The first was the admission you don't speak for all New Yorkers. Thanks. We are enjoying New York very much without you.
|
|
|
Post by Christine on Nov 4, 2017 18:55:53 GMT -5
Taking that aside and assuming there was a smaller turnout -- the parade started four hours after the attack, a few blocks away from it. You don't find anything cool and, like, resilient, about the fact it went forward and that lots of people turned out? I do find it admirable, for the record. It's just that, as per my first post in this thread, I don't find it different as per your contention that people living in New York are somehow special in this regard. I also don't imagine that every person who lives in New York feels exactly the same as those who showed up at the Halloween festival four hours after the attack. It doesn't make sense to me that simply because a person is a resident of New York, they're somehow categorically different than other Americans, or human beings, who have experienced terror attacks. Case in point, those who showed up in Vegas after the attack, those who showed up in Orlando after the attack. And then there's London. Paris. Etc. This is just silly on every level. No one has claimed that anyone is "cowering in their homes." No one is "getting in your face," unless you think disagreeing with you is getting in your face. Unless you think you are absolutely correct on this topic and any disagreement must be personal. 2/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2017 22:06:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nighttimer on Nov 5, 2017 11:47:08 GMT -5
Taking that aside and assuming there was a smaller turnout -- the parade started four hours after the attack, a few blocks away from it. You don't find anything cool and, like, resilient, about the fact it went forward and that lots of people turned out? I do find it admirable, for the record. It's just that, as per my first post in this thread, I don't find it different as per your contention that people living in New York are somehow special in this regard. I also don't imagine that every person who lives in New York feels exactly the same as those who showed up at the Halloween festival four hours after the attack. It doesn't make sense to me that simply because a person is a resident of New York, they're somehow categorically different than other Americans, or human beings, who have experienced terror attacks. Case in point, those who showed up in Vegas after the attack, those who showed up in Orlando after the attack. And then there's London. Paris. Etc. Pretty much this. A tragedy is a tragedy no matter where it is, no matter how large or small the body count is or how resolute the citizens are in in their response. You can't walk into a dance club in Orlando or Paris without instinctively looking for the nearest exit. Just in case. Or if you're strolling at a Christmas market in Berlin and a truck rumbles by without being at least wary about it. Or if you're walking through Times Square and wondering if that guy walking by all bundled up on a warm day is susceptible to catching cold easily or has a suicide vest he's waiting to trigger where the crowd is thickest and most likely to be most devastated. New York City is a target for terrorists. It's their Super Bowl, World Series and Nobel Nutcase Prize all rolled into one. Nobody doubts that. Nobody doubts many New Yorkers handle it by not by quaking and quivering in their designer boots, but by being wary of strange behavior and being aware of the oddity amidst the normal. This is not about being macho and telling the terrorists to fuck away off. They don't give a fuck about New Yorkers not giving a fuck. They're still gonna come here and they're still gonna try to take as many of you out as they can. This time they got a lot of tourists. Poor bastards like me and my wife are tourists here. We're going back home soon enough and leave with a bag full of swag and lots of good memories. This is our longest time spent here and we've had Big Fun. Not everything was great, but nothing has been so bad I'd never consider going back. New Yorkers have a right to be proud of where they live. It's a big, bad town and if you can't find it here, you probably don't need it anyway. I've always said you can have more fun in NYC with $100 than you can with $10,000 in most cities. Last night, I shared a Lyft to the Lower East Side with two young ladies, one of who was rocking a Cat in the Hat outfit (complete with hat) who asked the driver if she could play the music on the ride through her iPhone. I was expecting some pop or EDM from her playlist. Wrong. She started out with "Come As You Are" by Nirvana and switched over to new country complete with all the beer, pickup trucks and other cliches you can handle. Only in New York. But that didn't help those poor eight dead folks. Or those injured last Tuesday who will go through life missing limbs, facing years of painful recovery and scarred in ways we will never know because we're going to forget all about them soon enough. New York Strong like Boston Strong or Orlando Strong or Paris Strong or London Strong or Las Vegas Strong is great for morale, but it won't keep you safe when the monsters come out.
|
|